Yesterday I finished my second Donna Tartt book, ‘The little friend’. This book made a
great read and I would've rated it higher, only the ending left me feeling a
bit let down.
Tartt's writing takes me easily to a place and time
that consists of Mississippi heat, chattering old ladies and a sadness that
lingers after a child’s death years ago. The rich, captivating writing
quickly summoned me into the characters worlds in the same way Tartt did in
her first novel ‘The Secret History’.
However, with ‘The secret history’
I knew where the book was heading. I didn’t know how it would end, but I felt
the build up throughout and eventually when the climax reached its height.
With ‘The little friend’ I thought I knew where the book was headed but
instead of a climax, I was brought down and left perplexed; was the crime not
to be solved after all?
I read a lot of reviews on Goodreads and it could be
argued I missed the actual point of the book. Though the book expresses
itself as a murder mystery/thriller, the actual crime that takes place is not
the issue to be resolved. I found this very hard to get my head around
because when a book opens with a murder and unfolds itself as subject waiting
to be resolved, naturally I want a resolve by the ending.
Actually I was reminded of the recent film ‘Prisoners’ when reading this book.
Firstly because of the horrific subject of child abuse/murder and secondly
because of the sequences involving snakes. Both film and book left me in a
very similar resolve and though I enjoyed them, I felt unsure where to place
my emotions (which is rare for me). Am I being challenged in a new way
because I am watching/reading new types of thrillers? Or is the nature of
these books and films to feel numb by the finish?
I will read Donna Tartt’s ‘The Goldfinch’ because though ‘The little friend’ disappointed me a little, I still felt very
connected to the narratives and characters. There were some beautiful
sequences, particularly those involving Harriet and her quest to become like
the Great Houdini. Whilst training to hold her breath for 3 minutes, Harriet
embarked on a fantastic vision/hallucination that took her body from
conscious space to bizarre theatre hall with animal audiences and magician
illusionist.
The main aspects of character and human behaviour
were explored in a plentiful way that contrasted noise with silence. A chorus
of sound was conveyed through the warmth and fussiness of the aunts and the
constant hum of Ida Rhew. This was then met with an extended interval of
silence that found Harriet bleakly alone with her own thoughts in a silent
house. Everything constant about the house slowly glided away until only a
drifting mother remained, like a ghost in her sadness.
I can only guess that the ending felt the way it
did, because it was mimicking the unresolved feelings and limp emotions an
unexplained death will bring. Like Harriet, we are left in the same
indefinite void.